John MH

Reduced further.

Updated

Remaining Bipods reduced.

Updated, Sold items removed.

Selection of Spigot Type (male and female) Bipods.

First up is a Short Leg Length Versa-Pod with 'Talon Claws' and a Bag, Female Spigot Attachment with Locking Screws. The outer legs on the Versa-Pod are steel the inner legs are an aluminium alloy, the attachment body is also an aluminium alloy and the legs are spring loaded.£75.00 £65.00 £60.00 £50.00 £45.00 plus postage.

Next Standard Leg Length Versa-Pod, Round Rubber Feet and Female Spigot Attachment with Locking Screws, the outer legs on the Versa-Pod are steel the inner legs are an aluminium alloy, the attachment body is also an aluminium alloy and the legs are not spring loaded.£60.00 £50.00 £40.00 £30.00 plus postage.

British Made Parker Hale Steel Bipod, Standard Length with Round Rubber Feet, Female Spigot Attachment, £70.00 £60.00 plus postage. SOLD

AI Steel Bipod with Cant Tensioning Screw, Ski Type Feet with Rubber Boots, Male Spigot Attachment, £90.00 plus postage. SOLD

Atlas Bipod with Male Type SpigotAccuracy International Spigot, £150.00 plus postage. SOLD

2x Rigby Bipods, Steel and Aluminium Construction, a heavy bipod that is great for just prone shooting as you would not want it on your rifle in any other unsupported position or when moving around. This is for two one with a AI Male Spigot Attachment and one with a Anschutz Rail Attachment with a yoke designed for tubular forends, there are also some spare parts. £200 £190 £180.00 £170 £150 for the pair plus postage.

1 hour ago, gazzarM1 said:

On another note I have seen a mini bag fixed onto an arca rail on the rifle forend being advertised over the pond and watching some of the stages on the video it looks to me as if that would save valuable time on some stages instead of moving rifle/bag separately.

Are they available here?

I have an AT

 

Yes

Duffel Bag?

BAR or CMMG.

3 hours ago, hellandback said:

An appeal has been lodged with the LRB regarding planning, the 'Withdrawal' notice by Dumfries and Galloway was their administration error.

And yes, the Police guidance states that  "If a force requires expert advice on range construction, the NSRA or NRA will be willing to assist or the force could engage an independent assessor of its own." but it does not state that an Independent Range Safety certification is mandatory, this was an additional hoop we had to, albeit ultimately successfully, jump through. 

 

All worth the effort, fantastic facility from what I could see.

Have you paid for it?

https://www.spartanrefinishing.com/store/Vision-Chassis-Mid-Section-Sig-3000-STR200-p268347338

To rule out an issue with the dot on the sight rotate the sight and if the image bloom remains (assuming its an irregular shape) the same and does not rotate through the 360 degree rotation its your eyes that are the problem.

I can recommend the Old Vicarage.

I’ll take the .308 PMags

Was this a prize at the NRA CSR Imperial?

From my perspective the AMP Press is another measuring tool that ‘may’ assist in understanding what the effect of a change in process or procedure is having on your brass preparation. I don’t think it is going to be much use for ‘loading’ match ammunition and being able to segregate an ‘off the chart’ round based on seating force alone. The key to getting consistent results from your ammunition is consistent brass, powder, bullets; if everything is the same every time they should all start their journey down the barrel in the exact same way.

I think the AMP Press will be of limited use once you have, by experiment, determined what gives consistent ‘plots’, what is a good or a bad plot is not known or understood, however if they are all the same and sit on top of each other that must be good for ‘consistency’. 
 

It’s a bit like the argument about the accuracy of the actual ‘weight’ of a powder charge measured on a scale or balance beam, the ‘actual’ weight is not really that important, if the scale consistently reads +0.05 grains above ‘actual’ weight who cares as long as each charge is the same.

10 hours ago, Andrew said:

He can say what he wants about the AMP, but he said right off that he used the Bench Source up until he bought the AMP. If he is an established  champion shooter, who at least once shot 1.5 " at 1000 yards, he did it all using the Bench Source. That will be a hard fact to deconstruct while selling the virtues of the AMP.

I've got the Bench Source. Works fine for me. With the difference in pricing between the two units I saved enough to buy a new rifle~ Andrew

I think it was probably more than just the Bench Source.

Far better prepared than Eric was. As he says still early days to get to understand what the graphs are telling you. I think it’s going to take 100s if not 1000s to data collection and analysis to be able to understand what is ‘good’ in terms of load force graphs. Without the ability to compare groups on paper with graphs it’s all a bit of a shot in the dark and to do that will take time and resources I don’t have at present.

Eric’s test was a cluster, he was using a bullet seating die that was not matched to the brass, he was using a screwdriver to lever the cases out of the die. I must admit what started off as a reasonable test video became a joke towards the end.

This rifle has been well looked after and is a tack driver as I’ve seen it in use.

Go away 🤨

Confirmed its Hungary.

4 minutes ago, Popsbengo said:

I believe .223 Wylde is being referred to:   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.223_Wylde_chamber

 

I know, thanks.

1 hour ago, MrDuston said:

Hi,

What length is the barrel? Also is it a .223 and 5.56 wild?

Eh?

https://newlonprecision.com/products/sizing-dies