Jump to content

Oil, gas, and profit........


Re-Pete

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Re-Pete said:

Reads like a conspiracy theory;  no actual evidence just hyperventilated, non-objective rant against 'the man'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, terryh said:

… difference between a conspiracy and fact is normally 6-9 months 🤔😂😂

oh well, we'll see 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, terryh said:

… difference between a conspiracy and fact is normally 6-9 months 🤔😂😂

Maybe a quick read through of this:  https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour-hershs-pipe?fbclid=IwAR1vkEURrBRBbN0Neie-ZyBlocVwSC8oiiOsebdLPqDmwzBcxSQgBprv8z0

The original source of the Nordstream story reviewed and pulled to bits.   Of course, this could all be a media coverup  - couldn't it ??    Or it may just be the original story is just that... a story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Hersh is a respected Pulitzer prizewinning reporter, so by definition, there would be a lot of people in the corporate media trying to discredit him.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/seymour-hersh-breaks-my-lai-story      

Pete

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Re-Pete said:

Well Hersh is a respected Pulitzer prizewinning reporter, so by definition, there would be a lot of people in the corporate media trying to discredit him.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/seymour-hersh-breaks-my-lai-story      

Pete

 

I just don't buy this "corporate media" narrative,  makes no sense to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just look at the way different newspapers/news channels and the way their correspondents present the news.

I've followed this blog for years now, and it's been a real eye-opener. Here's an example:

https://www.medialens.org/ https://www.medialens.org/2023/harry-the-traitor-and-lynch-the-grinch-the-corporate-medias-automatic-smear-machine/

Pete

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Re-Pete said:

Just look at the way different newspapers/news channels and the way their correspondents present the news.

I've followed this blog for years now, and it's been a real eye-opener. Here's an example:

https://www.medialens.org/ https://www.medialens.org/2023/harry-the-traitor-and-lynch-the-grinch-the-corporate-medias-automatic-smear-machine/

Pete

 

 

I always read/watch/hear everything with a bucket of salt to hand as a pinch is never enough.  I don't care about celeb tittle-tattle and the press can get stuck up 'em for all it matters and I'm not about to accept any 'news' analysis from a tabloid.  I recommend Private Eye for investigative journalism, again with a skeptical view of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy