Popsbengo Posted September 26, 2021 Report Share Posted September 26, 2021 Just received a note from DIO regarding non-lead projectiles. The up-side (if any) is it adds weight to the argument to retain lead. "Issue, Non-leaded munitions fail to fragmentate when they hit the tgt and further breakup into the stop butt. This causes balling, which increases the risk of back splash and ricochet. DOSR WG have yet to understand what measures we are to adopt to manage non-lead munitions, there is very little to analyse. DIO have placed a restriction on all non-leaded munitions and Civilian Gun Clubs are NOT allowed to use on any UK DIO Ranges for the foreseeable future." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No i deer Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 Good job. I was told 2 weeks ago by a stalker he was given some copper bullets to try.. He's fired 1000s of our usual lead core bullets into his backstop and not one ricochet...!! He fired 5 all copper bullets and 2 out of the 5 ricocheted...!! I didn't like the sound of that...!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryh Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 Re. non lead for stalking, some game dealers will now not accept deer shot with lead bullets. Help out a stalking buddy re. load development using the 'Fox' non lead bullets, seemed OK in a 270. So bit stuck there I feel? T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akeld Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 DIO ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One on top of two Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 12 minutes ago, Akeld said: DIO ?? Defence Infrastructure Organisation in other words … The Governor.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popsbengo Posted September 27, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 11 minutes ago, Akeld said: DIO ?? Defence Infrastructure Organisation: The Ministry of Defense's civilian support outfit, they run ranges and manage landlord duties etc. Landmarc are a primary contractor to DIO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popsbengo Posted September 27, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 Just now, One on top of two said: Defence Infrastructure Organisation beat me by 10 sec! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akeld Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggy Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 And the DOSR WG means the Defence Ordnance, Munitions and Explosives Safety Regulator Working Group. In other words, the person and group who sets the safety rules for all MOD owned ranges. The Ministry of Defence really does love its acronyms! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popsbengo Posted September 27, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 5 hours ago, No i deer said: Good job. I was told 2 weeks ago by a stalker he was given some copper bullets to try.. He's fired 1000s of our usual lead core bullets into his backstop and not one ricochet...!! He fired 5 all copper bullets and 2 out of the 5 ricocheted...!! I didn't like the sound of that...!! a sort of a whizzing sound?, but seriously, I wonder if the Danes/Krauts have developed a solution on their ranges as users of non-lead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim DiGriz Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 That has always been the case, MoD safety templates have never been designed for monolithic projectiles and their simulation system has no monolithic projectiles in its database. I am currently in discussions with Cranfield University (who manage the system for the MoD) about access to/updating the simulation system database as FCSA (UK) has a large body of information regarding the behaviour of non lead projectiles. The riccochet/clumping behaviour of monolithic projectiles in backstops is different as well, which may lead to different material selection for backstops/riccochet traps and an increased cleaning regime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.