Jump to content

Re-Pete

Members
  • Posts

    1,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Re-Pete

  1. Thanks for that. It says it all, almost... I think it would be also useful if the FEO's had actual hands-on experience of shooting, and the associated firearms nomenclature as part of their training.

    (Years ago, we experienced some confusion about additional user-swappable barrels.....)

    Pete

  2. RobinC:

    I managed one  0.7 MOA 5 shot group using 80gn SMK and RS 52 at 600yds when we last shot at this distance (2019) on a reasonably calm day, but in mitigation I shoot prone off a home made bipod and my wind reading skills are somewhat sketchy to say the least.

    In view of the current weather, we're generally happy with 2 MOA, and ecstatic with anything less as far as the 223 is concerned.

    I've also tried the 223 at 1000yds, just for a laugh, and I was surprised to get 4 out of 10 shots inside the 4 ring  on a fairly calm day shortly after the Intarso's were installed on Stix. This was with a slightly hotter load of RS 52 giving an MV of around 3000 fps with the SMK 80's................never managed it again, though.

    We've had quite a few < 0.5 MOA's at 300 yds on calm days, so I think the 223 is definitely up for 300m in competent hands.

    iK_surrey:

    The Trakker rear dovetail has been machined out to fit the Tikka dovetail, which is wider than the 11mm Anschutz standard, so it's really part of the M595 TR set, together with an adjustable laminate stock.......afraid I'm not planning to sell this anytime soon.

    Pete

     

     

  3. On the subject of dud electronics, we lost 45mins at the start of our two hours on Century yesterday at 300yds.......I enquired about a refund in the Range Office, and was told to email them with details of the problem. I've had part refunds before, but no offer of compensation for the irritating waste of ammo while you try to decide if it's you or the system that's fallen over.

    We had to call the techies out, and it transpired that the Shotmarker sensors had been installed back to front. Once sorted, they were spot on.

    I can't understand what is so difficult about testing the system BEFORE the paying punters arrive.......

    Pete

  4. A quick "bodge" to get round the pathetic fragile micro USB socket which started to fail after a few sessions...........(assuming you'd rather use a rechargeable USB powerpack instead of half a dozen AA cells, and you don't want to spend money and be without it while you get the USB socket replaced).

    I bought this:

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/362259358711

    And this

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/334535894410?var=543598957761

    I've been inside my Labrad, and there's pretty much nowhere to do internal wiring as they've plastered hot melt everywhere. The main PCB has very fine tracks, and I wasn't about to risk a disaster.

    The two wooden "batteries" in pic B are there to avoid soldering to the Labrad battery holder, which could end in a lot of molten plastic.....the hole in the battery compartment lid is 8mm, which gives a tight fit on the magnetic USB adaptor that's plugged into the PCB.

    Polarity: The PCB GND is negative, and VBUS is positive. The + & - are embossed at the top centre of the battery compartment.

    And it all works fine....solid reliable contact even when jogged.

    Pete

     

    _D811268 PCB.jpg

    DSC00001 A.jpg

    DSC00002 B.jpg

    Hole.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy