i chose a 17 hornet over the rem because it moderates better than a hmr imo no where near the noise of the rem.10.2 grn of powder gets me 3580 fps with good accuracy. withoubt a doubt the 17 rem out guns it on every level but where do you stop ? so many things out gun the rem .2" drop out to 200 with my hornet and its for sub 300 yard rabbits . it will push way past 300 but wind reading gets interesting. barrel life will be much less on the rem i assume and is the one your looking at new ?
although i think the above link is priced fair not a total bargain because it is an older rifle the truth is the ranger at fac power can have a power curve that needs mapping. the wolf regulates shots to make hits far more consistent . you can sell sub 12 anywhere to any one but fac has a very small market.i would sell and buy a ready to go wolf etc every time.
if you dont want to count clicks use a calculator 33 - 3% = 32.01 and dial in or dial for 970 yards depending which way the known error goes. t is almost not worth it because of enviromental voodoo. i know my zero shifts from one range to another even with altitude and wind direction taken into account.
surely if there is a known 3% difference you would just input a new click value in your balistic program.which is the whole point of the tall target test as few scopes are exact.instead of 0.250 put 0.275 for example
the sporter tells you fps es and sd so all i want from a chrono. works on magnets not light so fine in the dark you just can't use it with a moderator.
withdrawn from sale. 8 th clicks ,zero stop ,moa ret, 34mm tube .few small marks from use but good condition overall.
https://imgur.com/igSmaiR
https://imgur.com/PI3EEYN
lmao stunning rifles mate.you know your posh when such stunning rifles are photod on a full size snooker table with a suit of armour in the back ground.i was going to post mine but the rifle on a chopping board just looks crap now