triggersqueezer

i chose a 17 hornet over the rem because it moderates better than a hmr imo no where near the noise of the rem.10.2 grn of powder gets me 3580 fps with good accuracy. withoubt a doubt the 17 rem out guns it on every level but where do you stop ? so many things out gun the rem .2" drop out to 200 with my hornet and its for sub 300 yard rabbits . it will push way past 300 but wind reading gets interesting. barrel life will be much less on the rem i assume and is the one your looking at new ?

this should have zero stop

never heard a bad thing said about them but had my ass kicked by people using them.

if you dont want to count clicks use a calculator 33 - 3% = 32.01 and dial in or dial for 970 yards depending which way the known error goes. t is almost not worth it because of enviromental voodoo. i know my zero shifts from one range to another even with altitude and wind direction taken into account.

surely if there is a known 3% difference you would just input a new click value in your balistic program.which is the whole point of the tall target test as few scopes are exact.instead of 0.250 put 0.275 for example

guys i travel from diggle to leicester if it helps anyone

the sporter tells you fps es and sd so all i want from a chrono. works on magnets not light so fine in the dark you just can't use it with a moderator.

had 2 found both spot on is the short answer .

swarovski with moa about time too,best start saving.

lmao stunning rifles mate.you know your posh when such stunning rifles are photod on a full size snooker table with a suit of armour in the back ground.i was going to post mine but the rifle on a chopping board just looks crap now

that is just showing off... very nice

dave is kindly doing one for me at the moment.can't wait.

i was admiring your rifle on daves site .she is beautiful mate.