Jump to content

Catch-22

Members
  • Posts

    1,770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Catch-22

  1. 3 hours ago, Ronin said:

    Thanks for the pics and explanation re the contamination 

     

    the pics of the chassis show some witness marks (tang area and around forward action screw hole 

    There are also witness marks on the action in similar areas 

    There doesn’t need to be any movement under recoil to create these marks 

    It highlights my point that even inlets thy replicate certain actions are not 100% contact and will cause stress in an action when torqued down due to elasticity of the materials and the high forces generated (even at 50 inch pounds) that’s enough to bend the action or pull it out of shape 

    This will have an adverse reaction to accuracy 

    How much is dependant on where and how much movement there is in the action and it’s effect on contact surfaces of bolt lug : abutments : barrel tenon 

    An example - last week I bedded a HS Prevision stock (alloy v block design in let) to a rifle I built two years ago, the rifle was put in a used pre bedded stock (bedded to another action) bought post build by the client - it shot sub half Moa in that stock

    I had some pictures back yesterday of groups shot with the rifle in the stock I bedded 

    Single hole, consistently repeatable groups 

    That demonstrates the importance of mating the action to the inlet with bedding 

    This isn’t the first time such improvements  have been highlighted 

    The rifle in question is for deer work - I’d recommend anyone with a comp gun give thought to this simple but effective improvement to their chassis based “system”

     

     

    Thanks Andy.

    I may well get the gun bedded at some point in the future.

    Cheers

  2. On 4/18/2024 at 10:46 AM, Ronin said:

    @Catch-22 

     

    Could you post a pic of the MPA action inlet (current) - intrigued to see if there are any witness marks showing on inlet or action base of the Inpact ,,,after several years of use in the chassis 

     

     

    Here you go Andy.

    Theres nothing on the chassis to suggest movement.

    I have marred the action finish a bit due to some Redline High Pressure grease I used on the bolt lugs reacting to some left over cleaning solvents unfortunately. I think this trickled down via the front action screw and got between the chassis and action unknowingly and wore away some of the actions surface finish between a cleaning one time. But it’s all cosmetic. Needless to say I don’t use Redline on my bolt lugs, I’ve gone back to the MilTec and take extra care now flushing the chamber and bore with isopropyl alcohol.

    Back to your question, I don’t see any signs of actual action movement in the chassis - which is good.

    If this was an F class rig, it would be bedded as a minimum, more likely glued and screwed. But for range/PRS style use, I think it’s fine!

    Interesting write up on PRS blog. Seems 50% of the top shooters skim bed their chassis. The reason given was not because they see accurate improvements or anything. It’s more they’re using it as an insurance policy in case they bang or drop the rifle during a strange at a match. But none seem to say it’s crucial to them. Again, f class is a whole different kettle of fish.

    IMG_0779.jpeg

    IMG_0781.jpeg

    IMG_0780.jpeg

    IMG_0777.jpeg

  3. RS52 is not too dissimilar to VARGET.

    It’s a bit more ‘high energy’ than N140 but less so than N540. But same sort of burn rate as N140.

    Lots of load data on the RS website, so as with any reloading, start on the low side and work up.

  4. 15 hours ago, mtrinder1991 said:

    Hi. Sorry about the delay in replying. I’ll take the RS62 please.  Just trying to figure out a day that I’ll be passing. You’re in Newport, right? 
    thanks 

    Mike 

    Hi Mike.

    Yes I’m based in Newport, but if you shoot with MDRC I can meet at the Tunnel or at MOD range dates if that’s easier.

    Please send me a PM about payment and to arrange handover.

    Cheers 👍

  5. 19 hours ago, ds1 said:

    If you do it I would Vapor blast (aka wet blasting) as it leaves a higher quality surface than sand or bead blasting. I have only had DLC (which is hard) Vapor blasted from stainless surfaces.

    Thanks, looking into it that does seem to be the best option. 
    There’s a really good vapour blasting place not far from me, so I’ll speak to them.

    thanks again!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy