Jump to content

DaveT

Members
  • Posts

    1,735
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DaveT

  1. I use it in hopes of prolonged barrel life in 6mm and others where I use double-based powder.

    The problem being how can you measure that with any degree of 'science'?

    For certain your barrel will not foul anywhere near as much as with bare bullets and I see no cold bore shots but on this latter point many believe its a 'cold shooter' issue!

    It is very easy to apply without mess and a tiny bit goes a very long way.

     

     

  2. Pay as much attention to your business model as the targetry.

    I am sure that setting up a proper facility is incredibly expensive but when I see others needing / wanting to charge £35 per hour it becomes out of reach personally.

    Can the UK market stand what you may need to charge to recoup your outlay?

    I any event ...the very best of luck....we need more ranges and ones that cater for more than paper punching.

  3. Thats my point....the AMP guys appear to have done exhaustive hardness testing to produce case-specific programs for spot-on annealing that you can believe in.

    Although the underlying technology may be similar I don't see a valid comparison on price or accuracy between these two extremes of tech.

    I want an AMP but struggle to justify the cost.

    I run a gas system at present using Tempilaq.

    It's clumsy using gas/Tempilaq but I can't see how guessing at induction annealing 'doneness' is any advance.

  4. Certainly an attractive price vs the AMP but surely more than a bit 'Heath Robinson'? in its setup and how can you know that the anneal is done right?

    I would love a sub £500 solution but also want it to be as reliably foolproof as the AMP appears to be.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy