Jump to content

Chris-NZ

Members
  • Posts

    1,807
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chris-NZ

  1. It has been used especially in the US but has very adherents. The reason for this is recoil. Very few shooters are able to tolerate extended fire with a round of that power without accuracy suffering. Just because someone can tolerate a grunty sporter for a few rounds doesn't mean they will be able to handle a WM or  WSM in FO. But hey, you may be the rare exception.

  2. One big thing with PCPs is improved neighbourly relations if you live on small blocks. My neighbours are unaware I'm using the PCP but even the quietest rimfire round is usually detectable to them. I can be knocking over pest birds and bunnies without them being concerned.

  3. Yeh, I'm not qualified to comment as I only tutored stats at uni. Forgotten most now but still remember enough to know 5 data points is a token effort at best. In the end, ES is the telling thing with target work, ie, your worst outliers which cost the points.

  4. 8 hours ago, nCognitos said:

    I really am not interested in a discussion on methodology, but if anyone has an opinion on the original question, I would be grateful.  ..

    Ok, my "analysis" is your data is so limited is that you are unable to draw any valid conclusions. It's pointless talking SD with such minute samples. You'd warm up with an ES assessment with 10 shots and more realistically 20 if you're serious. As for pressure, only a strain gauge will tell you the actual pressure. Modelling will give you an idea of ballpark. I'd rely more on signs like primer flattening and difficult bolt lift ultimately.

    I'd suggest you focus more on groups than "statistics"

  5. A comment about durability- I have sitting on the back of the bench a dead Lyman borecam. A wire has clearly broken just out of the cam tube so it's basically a write-off as no spares available. I was very gentle with it, as with all important cables, but this one did little mileage :(

  6. While I'm an FO shooter, as Furrybean has said the growth area is FTR, at least here in NZ. More specifically, our category of "FTR Classic" has taken off. This is limited to rifles shooting 155s and allows far more people to compete without the arms/$$ race that FTR became. Many serious FTR ( fast twist/ heavies) rigs are only a tad removed from full-blown FO, ie too expensive for many folks. With Classic, shooters can start cheaply by getting an old target rifle, throwing a scope and bipod on it and they're away.

    There's nothing to stop you changing to FO later, in fact FTR is a great training ground as you'll learn wind better.

  7. Too many shooter fail to realise "stainless" barrels are only corrosion resistant, not corrosion free. If you leave patches of carbon especially in there, corrosion can occur under them. The cleaning regimen the vast majority of casual shooters use can easily lead to this outcome. That's where borescopes are helpful at determining how good a job you've done at cleaning.

  8. Well, like my PCP, you set the scope for whatever the current average distance is, in the case of last night with a plague of swallows on our roof, about 25yds. Got 19 of them in about 20mins, tally for three days about 45 and still the little sh!ts come..  Roof is getting covered in crap and we drink the water (life sentence block). Even with the scope backed off to 10X, the parallax/dreadful focus would be intolerable on a non-adjustable scope.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy