-
Posts
75 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by biged85
-
-
I have been in the lucky position to test a lot of scopes recently including the IOR crusader and more recently a PM2 with LRR-Mil ret. I think I could waffle on for hours talking about them both.
The IOR I tested functioned flawlessly and had its features were very impressive - i.e. mag range, the amount of internal adjustment, the simplicity of the turrets etc etc. However, it was a prime example of a scope that will forever split opinion it as simple as that. (optical clarity, position of the parralax adjustment etc) but it is feature rich and performs to a high level which is where IOR gain their following.On the flip side, the S&B PMII for example quite simply appeals to the masses. Everything is done in a way that satisfies peoples desires (renowned glass, functionality, heritage/reputation, huge range of options etc etc) Does this make it a better scope?Not necessarily! I think this is where people get in a muddle when comparing/reviewing scopes. After all SO much is about personal preference.I shall stop waffling now -
Long range scope options.
in Riflescopes & NV
Posted
I agree that your best bet is going to a show and trying as many as possible to reduce your number of options. Just make sure you spend the time adjusting the scope to your eyes before passing judgement, especially FFP ones.
Once you have few preferred choices then see if you can find someone who will let you have a butchers out in the field.
However, If in doubt just buy a S&B PMII, you can't go too wrong with one of those!
Good luck