Jump to content

gyr

Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gyr

  1. I am sorry if this topic has been covered but could not find the thread.

    I have seen a post where Laurie said the US Lapua team could not find a good load for the 6,5 136L  some years ago . 
     

    Apart from the slight price difference, are the L´s better or more finicky to tune?

    The 136 has a lower BC than the 139 , and the 155´s seem to be similar.

    139´s are still available and they have worked well for me in the past in 6,5 x 55 and 65-284. Old 155´s seem harder to find.
     

    So is it worth to change?

    thanks

  2. I would recommend 140 grain bullets. The old amax 140 worked well for target shooting and small game up to roedeer/goats. The newer 140ELDM is also good but expands noticeablybless. For red deer I would use a specific hunting bullet like 143eldx, 140 nosler accubond or similar. Scenars 139 are also great for target shooting.

    Any powder in the range of vectan t7000, 4350, vihta 160/165 will work.

  3. I tried the N160 with Scenar 139 and the Hornady ELDM 140, small primer Lapua brass, Murom primers.

    Lapua SP brass, Scenar 139, V 160 42,5 grains= 2578 ft/s.

    Lapua SP brass, Hornady 140 ELDM, 42 grains=2498 ft/s.

    24" barrel.

     A little disappointing.

    Either I go for bigger loads or try RS62 ( RS62 is single base , right??)

     

     

  4. If boar or deer will  be hunted in driven hunts I would go with the 308 for sure.

    in stalking situations,as has been said, there will not be a lot of difference in ballistics up to 300-400m depending on bullet use.

    For light game like roedeer I like the 6,5 better. If you plan shooting boar and red deer I would opt for the 308. And if ranges will be past 400m or so, think about a better ballistics 30 cal or a 7 cal.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy