Jump to content

Annealing


stottycake

Recommended Posts

The induction annealer you’re looking at is the same as I’ve got.

I followed the instructions per this video and it works a charm. Took 20mins to get setup (most of that was stripping the insulating plastic from around the cables) and is really great.

I get very consistent results and it anneals beautifully

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catch-22 said:

The induction annealer you’re looking at is the same as I’ve got.

I followed the instructions per this video and it works a charm. Took 20mins to get setup (most of that was stripping the insulating plastic from around the cables) and is really great.

I get very consistent results and it anneals beautifully

 

That's the video I watched first ,and that's why I was asking if it was worth doing,cheers 

Al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stottycake said:

Did you buy the timer ,or just do it manually so to speak,

I bought the annealer (same as you see in the vid), the timer and an extension chord.

I used a very small Tupperware box, with lid, as the box for the wires and the timer to go into. But as the video shows, you could use an only box for bullets.

Ill pm you the eBay listings I used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly an attractive price vs the AMP but surely more than a bit 'Heath Robinson'? in its setup and how can you know that the anneal is done right?

I would love a sub £500 solution but also want it to be as reliably foolproof as the AMP appears to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No annealing method definitively tells you if its "done right"

The only way to be sure is to measure the hardness at the neck of the case before and after annealing.

See how that's done here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF0YmmeEJK4&t=1740s&ab_channel=RussDouglas222

 

Cheers

 

Bruce

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats my point....the AMP guys appear to have done exhaustive hardness testing to produce case-specific programs for spot-on annealing that you can believe in.

Although the underlying technology may be similar I don't see a valid comparison on price or accuracy between these two extremes of tech.

I want an AMP but struggle to justify the cost.

I run a gas system at present using Tempilaq.

It's clumsy using gas/Tempilaq but I can't see how guessing at induction annealing 'doneness' is any advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using a cheap hardness testing device, per what Bruce shows, is really the only way to tell definitively.

Using tempilaq as an indicator is wrong because it’ll tell you when you’ve reached 750f…but that’s incorrect for annealing brass. Annealing brass at 750f only applies if heating for…30mins, by which time the heat has has sunk into the case head and ruined the brass.
To properly anneal your brass, without ruining the web, you need to go hotter 750f for shorter (called Flash Annealing), typically around the 1000f mark for a mere 2-3 seconds (all depends on the calibre, brand and metallurgy of brass used, output of the annealer, size and position of coil etc). But typically when reaching the 1000f mark, brass will change colour slightly and begin, ever so slightly, to turn a feint red. Bright orange is bad.

Then the only way to test whether annealing at that given temp+time is going to make a difference to your ES/SD is to go shoot over a chronograph. Go anneal for different lengths of time and watch for a lowering of ES/SD before it increases again. The time+temp of the anneal which produces the lowest ES/SD is the optimum anneal point for your brass.

Essentially, it’s this testing (finding the optimum anneal time+temp), and measuring hardness, is what you pay for with the AMP as they’ve done that leg work for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people agree that the AMP annealer is the gold standard in inductive annealers and there's no doubt they have done a ton of research and work to produce a machine that does a good job of annealing cartridge brass.

The one part of their process I don't understand is that when you have brass that you don't have an annealing code for, you put it in the AMP and it destroys a case then gives a code for that specific brass.

I'd like to know what parameter(s) the machine measures to decide the exact annealing code

I'm presuming the code is some combination of power and time that gets the brass hot enough for long enough to get the hardness down to the same (or close to the same) as new brass

 

Cheers

 

Bruce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just "annealed" 200 .308 Lapua cases using molten salt method.  4sec at 520C.  As usual I expect excellent performance as previously achieved.  Cheap and (more importantly) extremely consistent process every time.

Not wanting to get into yet another round of arguments about this subject, using whatever process floats your boat,  I just offer the thought that (as Catch-22 says above) it's about the results.  I would add it's NOT about some variable hardness test or other such indirect measure of performance value.  For some it's also about case life.

I "anneal" .308 after shooting every 4th reload.  I full-length size about 2thou knock back, and I use a mandrel bullet press so I can feel the pressure of insertion - and it's very consistent. This is born out by results at the range (only place it matters).  Whether "annealing" is achieved is a moot point - I couldn't careless about the grain structure or some other quality measured in a lab (or not).

I routinely get sub 1/2 moa performance at +500yds.  The cases last until the primer pockets are too loose and I've never seen a hint of a neck crack.  Generally I get 12 ~14 reloads from a LRP Lapua case before I judge the primer pockets too loose.  I may get more from SRP cases - time will tell.

Not sure what else needs to be achieved ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Popsbengo said:

I've just "annealed" 200 .308 Lapua cases using molten salt method.  4sec at 520C.  As usual I expect excellent performance as previously achieved.  Cheap and (more importantly) extremely consistent process every time.

Not wanting to get into yet another round of arguments about this subject, using whatever process floats your boat,  I just offer the thought that (as Catch-22 says above) it's about the results.  I would add it's NOT about some variable hardness test or other such indirect measure of performance value.  For some it's also about case life.

I "anneal" .308 after shooting every 4th reload.  I full-length size about 2thou knock back, and I use a mandrel bullet press so I can feel the pressure of insertion - and it's very consistent. This is born out by results at the range (only place it matters).  Whether "annealing" is achieved is a moot point - I couldn't careless about the grain structure or some other quality measured in a lab (or not).

I routinely get sub 1/2 moa performance at +500yds.  The cases last until the primer pockets are too loose and I've never seen a hint of a neck crack.  Generally I get 12 ~14 reloads from a LRP Lapua case before I judge the primer pockets too loose.  I may get more from SRP cases - time will tell.

Not sure what else needs to be achieved ?

 

I think you got it right, brass life matters, not grain structure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy