Jump to content

Fortmeier over the top bipod


Recommended Posts

I am thinking of buying one of the above ,I have a MDT LLS XL GEN 2 Chassis,and thinking of buying

 MDT NV Hoods to fit on to accommodate the fortmeier,my question is will it affect my vision through

the scope,as it is mounted low, thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s a weird placement for the PodLock. mine doesn’t look like that. My spigot has the PodLock, not the bridge.
Looks like the bridge was originally a 6 o clock version, then the user switched the picatinny spigot upside down and placed the PodLock in the top where the proper torx bolt should go.

Id say that if you had a ‘genuine’ 12 o clock bridge and picatinny spigot, then you should have enough clearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catch-22 said:

That’s a weird placement for the PodLock. mine doesn’t look like that. My spigot has the PodLock, not the bridge.
Looks like the bridge was originally a 6 o clock version, then the user switched the picatinny spigot upside down and placed the PodLock in the top where the proper torx bolt should go.

Id say that if you had a ‘genuine’ 12 o clock bridge and picatinny spigot, then you should have enough clearance.

Yeh, I did move the locking lever to the top - so it's easy to adjust when you set up and I never remove the fixing, so the Allen screw is fine on the side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why you’d do that tbh, unless of course you’re using the 6 o’clock Fortmeier rather than the proper 12 o’clock version for over barrel shooting.

Personally I find it incredibly fast attaching and detaching the bipod with the PodLock on the spigot, especially given there’s a QD leaver on the bridge that permits the bridge to separate from the spigot in a second or two...and it definitely doesn’t stop me from seeing the target 😂

Adjusting the bipod is perfectly fine and fast, not that it needs to be as it’s not a PRS gun or bipod designed for PRS use. I’d suggest the OP should be fine with the PodLock in its original place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough!

But still not sure why you don’t just leave spigots (w. PodLocks) on the rails (per what you’ve said) and just remove the bridge using the built in QD leaver on the side. Refer to the last of my photos, top left of bridge (when looking at photo) shows the QD leaver.

Surely you can then leave the podloc alone and avoid it sticking out the top, obscuring the target?

Anyway, each to their own!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy