Jump to content
UKV - The Place for Precision Rifle Enthusiasts
Sign in to follow this  
DaveT

Remington short action dimensions

Recommended Posts

Have just started looking at my sons 260 Rem based on late 80s (I think) Rem action serial number  C6617865 in order to assess what degree of MOA rail it needs to allow for more elevation on the scope.

He has a Sightron 8 -32 x 56 which appears to have almost 80 moa total range and his current 100 yard zero leaves him with 41 moa UP elevation available and then 39 moa under his 100 yard zero.......on the face of it the rail must be zero slope...I thought.

However, the rail says is is 20 moa and it does look thicker at the back.......rough calc says it should be about .035" thicker for a 158mm / 6" rail.

If it IS 20 moa then the scope should not be optically  centred for a 100 yard zero and greater elevation should be available.

I will be taking everything apart to measure rail and action properly but in the meantime I Googled Rem 700 action blueprints which appear to show the the external diameter of the action front being larger than the rear...if true then wouldn't this negate the moa rail cant?

Must admit I am confused at present and any input appreciated.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The factory solid model for a 700 receiver has the following dimensions.

front receiver ring 1.357in Diameter

Rear receiver bridge is a 2.025in radius surface, and is .565in from centreline.

difference in height between both surfaces is .1137in.

 

If you add on your .0349 sine height value for a 6inch 20moa surface, you should be able to see if your rail is somewhere in the vicinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paddy.....will do.....or might just give it to you to look at!

Many thanks for info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

The rear receiver is the same diameter as the front but just milled away on the upper surface for reasons best known to Remington, so your base should be a lot thicker at the rear as it it needs to make up for the .1137 as Paddy says plus whatever extra height to give the required slope.   I have a Rem 40X which is the same as the 700 and using the same scope as your son but with Nightforce 20MOA two piece bases at 300 yards I am 31.5MOA from absolute bottom, so figure around 28 at 100 yards.   So your base may be 20MOA but the barrel happens to be shooting low, receiver threads not cut straight or other tolerances endemic in mass produced actions.

Richard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richard..thanks for your input....helps confirm my findings.

Think I will get a unimount and throw it on top to get me where I need to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

Or you could use Burris Signature rings which could give you another 20 MOA approx with the offset inserts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

RifleMags_200x100.jpg

Northallerton NSAC shooting.jpg

border_ballistics_UKV_ad.jpg

dolphin button4 (200x100).jpg

CASEPREP_FINAL_YELLOW_hi_res__200_.jpg

rovicom200.jpg

BHTargets200.jpg

Lumensmini.png

CALTON MOOR RANGE (2) (200x135).jpg

bradley1 200.jpg

NVstore200.jpg

Danny Trowsdale 200.png

safeshot 200.jpg

tacfire 200.jpg

blackrifle.png

jr_firearms_200.gif

valkyrie 200.jpg

tab 200.jpg

 

 



×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy