Jump to content
UKV - The Place for Precision Rifle Enthusiasts

ronzi83

Members
  • Content count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ronzi83

  • Rank
    Newbie or Infrequent Poster

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ronzi83

    Looking for: Minimum neck surface to hold bullet

    Interesting. I forgot to ask also 1 more question regards to neck. I see that my neck is not getting any longer from FL resizing and tbh when i do fl with my redding die with bushing and using redding shellholders, sholder will still be same number as case before FL. So instead getting my neck longer and thiner i think is getting shorter.
  2. ronzi83

    Looking for: Minimum neck surface to hold bullet

    Yes, but i think i will need to give riffle to gunsmith to cut down freebore. VLD bullets will not even have any surface if i manage to buy them, cose are really streight on end.
  3. ronzi83

    Looking for: Minimum neck surface to hold bullet

    There are a lot "recommendations" around, but i would like to know what happen if i go 0.137 ? It will shoot bad or not consistence? Becose i did reload in past, but never payed attention at that time 2 years ago.
  4. Hello all. For long time i wanted to ask somone who has more experiences than me, how important IS/OR is there any "minimum" neck surface to hold bullet? Why i am asking this, because my gun has really long neck space (i think it is called) and my bullets touch rifling at almost whole bullet our of neck and it has only 0,137" surface that holds it (bullet). Some people said to me i need to go with diameter (0.264) but at same time some people say i should reload bullet just touching riflings. So for me there can not be both options, only one. If i go bullet diameter will be my coal 2.809 , if i go with hornady gage to just touch riflings will be my COAL 2,936. Any sugesstions and will be problem with so small surface to hold bullet (consistant)? I use 6.5 creedmore, 139 scenar Lapua bullets Regards Greg
  5. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Interesting. What COAL do you end on , or most common. I have option to have 2'933 but i went to 2'800 as sugessted
  6. Hello guys, I would like to ask you if anyone could tell me benefits or pros to buy rather bag or monopod. I use krg X-Ray chassis and shoot on long range Regards
  7. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Ok, from today shooting 100m, rs62, 139scenar, cci br4, SP lapua case, 29celsius, 2245 ogive / 2805 coal. Would you agree 44,3 node? Last 5 shoots are manufacturer load from Hornady 147 eld match ammo (1,86€ pcs)
  8. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    I used cci br4, Lapua case and bullet
  9. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    I will go this week to Bzenec CZ and try 44.3 at 800m
  10. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Ok, looks like i read it wrong. So that nice little group was actually 44.3 with 2257ogive. So looks like i need to give it a try 44.3-44.6.
  11. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Also speed: 42.8 : 2708, 2692, 2698,2696,2697 44.3: 2800,2814,2804,2803,2817 44.8: 2833,2848,2826,2849,2823 What i can not understand is how can seating influence on bullet. My max ogive is 2338 and i did reload as manufacture of powder sugesst me to go 2247. Is this to huge step ? But on other hand i think bullet it has to little surface to hold bullet probably and therefore can not be constant.
  12. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Hello, Thank you for sugesstion. Yesterday I tested 44.8 grains with 0.010" longer seating deph 2.257 (instead 2.247). 5 shoot group at 100m. Next picture is 3 groups at 300m, start with 42.8, than 44.3 and 44.8 (down) but all 3 in seating deph at 2.247. I must say I had quite mirage. Sugesstion?
  13. ronzi83

    Ocw results

    Hello guys, So I made ocw with rs62 and 139 lapua scenar in 6.5 creedmoor 1/8 twist 24". Here are results, with 3 shoots and than 4th per group. I did round robin system Regards
  14. ronzi83

    S070 vs RS62

    Yes, my main application will be for 6.5 creedmoor. I can get 1kg for 66€ , RS62 it is 96€ for me and a bit less than kg of H4350 is 115€. I am not totally of money saving (can be part of decision factor) but trying to get as optimal powder for 139- 140 bullets and as far i read here on forum the rs62 was the powder to try. I would like also to ask people here bout Explosia powders, since i think they got not so much attention and wondering why is that, since they have range of powserd and granulation is superb.
  15. ronzi83

    S070 vs RS62

    Hello, I would like to ask you if anyone have tried explosia S070, since it is on same burning chart as rs62? I am asking, because it is cheaper than RS62 and if is simmular than no need to buy expansive powders. Regards
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy