Jump to content

Nosler 20g 17 cal varmageddon


Recommended Posts

Hi Si,

 

Are you getting another .17 matey? ;)

 

Give Jon at http://jdreloading.com/ a try, really nice honest guy. He seems to be able to get alot of things that nobody else can, when there was shortage of 75/80 grain Amaxs and nobody in the UK could get any, Jon got me 2000 of each from the states!

 

Worth a try fella.

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My friend had a FB. To be fair there's not much in it. Rem is a little faster as you can imagine which in reality makes only a small difference. It's all down to dialling/holding go the wind and range. In my opinion get the one you fancy and not because one is 200 fps faster than the other.

The niche elements are there in both. Speed, low bullet weight, flat trajectory, low recoil all compound it's user friendliness and high safety aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend had a FB. To be fair there's not much in it. Rem is a little faster as you can imagine which in reality makes only a small difference. It's all down to dialling/holding go the wind and range. In my opinion get the one you fancy and not because one is 200 fps faster than the other.

The niche elements are there in both. Speed, low bullet weight, flat trajectory, low recoil all compound it's user friendliness and high safety aspect.

Sanity speaks!

The same holds for not pushing either cartridge-for the 17rem at least,near SAAMI is fast enough,you won't see much performance improvement upping fps-remember too,it's a relatively short range number,at least if you want it's initial impressive velocity advantages-it sheds fps faster too....oh,and might vapourise ultralight bullets...don't go up there! Super cartridge(s) used as Si says.

gbal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend had a FB. To be fair there's not much in it. Rem is a little faster as you can imagine which in reality makes only a small difference. It's all down to dialling/holding go the wind and range. In my opinion get the one you fancy and not because one is 200 fps faster than the other.

The niche elements are there in both. Speed, low bullet weight, flat trajectory, low recoil all compound it's user friendliness and high safety aspect.

Cheers. I thought along the same lines and got the Rem mostly because of availability of brass and dies, and finding a nice rifle. I have a nice accurate mid range (speed/powder wise) load with 25gn V-Max and I love shooting it. Though I do wonder what it would do at "full power" :-)

 

Just 2 more questions if you'll humour me:

How many rounds did you get out of the barrel?

Why shoot a 20gn bullet rather than 25gn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with the 20's to maximise safety around livestock and on flatter fields. The lighter and faster a bullet is the more frangible it becomes.

I switched barrels to move to a different calibre as I needed a high volume 400 yards gun so moved to 223 and my bro in law bought my barrel at a shot count of 950. Still was going strong and bore looked clean in the bore scope. I'd be looking at 2000 if it's not being cooked as a prediction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im on my 4th barrel in 25 years if you don't hot shoot the barrel and clean it it will last, my last barrel a pacnor was shooting 1/4 inch 3 shot group at approx. 2600 rounds at 3850 fps sweet little pill dave ps if your gonna shoot 25 gr vmax make sure your barrel is a 1/9 twist 1/10 wont stabilize them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They come in 250 packs too which would be sweet!!

Yes Steve I'm in possession of a 17 Rem now.

Let the fun begin again :) , and hopefully more vids ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

being nostler they would be better then the 20 vmax. I coudlnt believe how inconsistent the 20 vmax lengths are

box I had where all over the place

 

At the end of the day its a vermin bullet not a match one, minute of maggi at 100 yards is fine.

 

In my younger days I would always sort my bullets by weight but never length, perhaps I was wrong but in my book weight is more important than length for tight groups. Never felt the need to sort 17 cal bullets though as I rarely shoot it at paper.

 

A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy